No Public Name
Leisure travelers
50-59 years
Reviewed:
12 years ago
(04/09/2014)
Date of experience:
09/2014
No Public Name
Leisure travelers
50-59 years
Reviewed:
12 years ago
(03/09/2014)
Date of experience:
09/2014
By Maarth
Leisure travelers
50-59 years
Reviewed:
12 years ago
(01/09/2014)
Date of experience:
08/2014
No Public Name
Leisure travelers
40-49 years
Reviewed:
12 years ago
(22/08/2014)
Date of experience:
08/2014
No Public Name
Leisure travelers
60-69 years
Reviewed:
12 years ago
(17/08/2014)
Date of experience:
08/2014
By Prof.Dr.G.Franz
Business
70-79 years
Reviewed:
12 years ago
(16/08/2014)
Date of experience:
08/2014
No Public Name
Leisure travelers
60-69 years
Reviewed:
12 years ago
(16/08/2014)
Date of experience:
08/2014
By jackie maltman
Leisure travelers
60-69 years
Reviewed:
12 years ago
(15/08/2014)
Date of experience:
08/2014
No Public Name
Leisure travelers
60-69 years
Reviewed:
12 years ago
(14/08/2014)
Date of experience:
08/2014
No Public Name
Leisure travelers
50-59 years
Reviewed:
12 years ago
(13/08/2014)
Date of experience:
08/2014
See above.
First room (201) is almost in acceptable, as can only be used with a condition, as Windows can not be opened. Almost no natural daylight as deep in the book the court yard.
Second room, for the same price (118), was much better as daylight and windows to be opened, and some view all to the street.